Jo(hn)urnalism

When discussing magazines in class and talking about their original intent of delivering something to every person, that idea really clicked with me. Personally, when I have a magazine, I do as I please in terms of reading and comprehension. Magazines have just always been that medium that could give you whatever it is you wanted at the time. Like if you were in the mood to read an in-depth article, there are always countless stories to dive into. But at the same time, there is a wide variety of photo journalistic aspects, and quizzes, and more fluff than you know what to do with. Even though we didn't really discuss this in class, I thought about it more after. When I really think about it, Magazines are like many other forms of media, for the fact that it holds a lot of cultural significance. For me at least, magazines have always been a staple in my household. I can remember distinct memories of magazines and flipping through them dozens and dozens of times as a kid. That'

In yet another online story posted to Wave3's website, they have continued to disregard the following of the journalistic yardsticks. The story in this edition is titled, "That's the fact, Mack! Bill Murray visits UofL hoops practice." Now I do understand, much of the Wave3's audience is UofL fans. These fans might just happen to also like Bill Murray. But that has nothing to do with this stories newsworthiness. It's so very clear that this story will lack a large or lasting impact on the community. Wave3 did explain, however, that Bill Murray did have a tie of his son being an assistant coach for the squad. Yet, that fact truly shows that this is yet another case of Wave3 trying to make something that they find interesting, important to the public. I believe that instead of trying to have us view celebrity fluff so often, news stations like Wave3 and other local networks should create more hard-hitting, long lasting, and important stories for their audienc

In a story ran on Wave3's website entitled, "On eve of Halloween, it's National Candy Corn Day", the station posted the story, originally done by CNN. Now while I do agree that Candy Corn seems to be a surprisingly heated subject for people to discuss, I find it completely ridiculous to feel it necessary to make a story out of it. Now I do understand, Wave3 did not have anything to do with the writing of the story. But similar to what we discussed in class, a news media outlet doesn't have  to share anything and everything. Wave3, didn't at all have to share this pointless story. This story by no means follows the yardsticks of journalism. In fact, it completely goes against the very guidelines of Newsworthiness  and Explanation. In terms of this story being locally relevant, there's not much to say. This will have no large effect on anyone, nor will it have any lasting effect on anyone. This proved that is directly violates to yardstick of Newsworthine

In a story featured on Wave3 news' online page titled, " Mom, daughter score winning $1 million Powerball ticket in Crestwood," Wave3 reported on the lucky winners. Now, while this may have been interesting to hear about a winning ticket so close to home, it is in no way particularly newsworthy. Of course, this was a enormous amount of money that these two women are now the proud recipients of, but that in no way means that it follows any of the elements or yardsticks of journalism. I believe and know that our local news has the duty and obligation to provide us with the most current, correct, and newsworthy news. But when stories like this are so frequently aired, it makes me feel like our own news stations don't value providing us with news that will have any lasting impact on our community whatsoever. Wave3's Original Story