Skip to main content

My Response to Liz Klein's Post about The Killing of Botham Jean


Liz's Original Post

When I read Liz's post, I totally agreed with what she had to say. I believe that what happened to Botham Jean is completely inexcusable. I also believe that this was another example of police using their power and authority to target unarmed, black men. I agree with Liz that it would be absolutely terrifying to be in his situation. He was doing absolutely nothing wrong. The fault of this crime belongs on the shoulders of the Dallas police officer, Amber Guyger.
It's a disturbing and contradictory thought. Police are meant to be the watchdogs and protectors of our communities. They're meant to keep us safe. It's in their job description. So why would someone, who should be the most trained member of our society in gun safety, be so reckless. How come she didn't see the moved furniture? How didn't she see the doormat? Why was her gun her first reaction?
It is because of tragedies like this, that men, women, and children of color see the police as less of people to trust and to feel safe with, and more as something to fear.
Although I, as a white man, have never experienced anything even close to what people of color go through every day, I try to comprehend the struggles that they face.
For Liz's final statement, she states, "Regardless of how you choose to picture it, Botham Jean, a black man, was murdered while doing nothing but simply living his life..." It's terrifying really. The thought of being so vulnerable, in your own home, and to have your life taken away from you. To be taken from your family. To be taken from your community. And all because you were doing everything right.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Biases and Journalism.

For this blog post, I decided to take it back to the very beginning of school. To our discussion of what makes a good journalist. When we discussed what makes a good journalist and good journalism, the class was asked to share out what we believed the aspects of good journalism to be. Among the many standards, the quality of unbiased  was presented. This aspect stuck with me and made me think deeper about what it entails from a journalistic point of view. Of course it makes since. We as people appreciate our new and media to be completely objective. We want the facts with one hundred percent certainty that they haven't been given to us with a kind of filter on them. But i think it's important to realize just how biased we as humans are. No matter if we'd like to admit it or not, everyone has biases. Even journalists. Which means that a lot of the things that you'll find out in the media is definitely biased. Whether it's that of the writer or the company overlook...

It May be Candy Corn, but is it Relevant?

In a story ran on Wave3's website entitled, "On eve of Halloween, it's National Candy Corn Day", the station posted the story, originally done by CNN. Now while I do agree that Candy Corn seems to be a surprisingly heated subject for people to discuss, I find it completely ridiculous to feel it necessary to make a story out of it. Now I do understand, Wave3 did not have anything to do with the writing of the story. But similar to what we discussed in class, a news media outlet doesn't have  to share anything and everything. Wave3, didn't at all have to share this pointless story. This story by no means follows the yardsticks of journalism. In fact, it completely goes against the very guidelines of Newsworthiness  and Explanation. In terms of this story being locally relevant, there's not much to say. This will have no large effect on anyone, nor will it have any lasting effect on anyone. This proved that is directly violates to yardstick of Newsworthine...

My Thoughts on Conglomeration

In Mr. Miller's class, we discussed conglomeration and the pro's and con's of it. At first, I honestly hadn't thought that deeply into giant corporations such as The Walt Disney Company or AT&T. But because of our discussion in class, its helped me realize more about the affect of conglomerates. What I had thought was obvious before class was that these huge corporations has a massive impact on what we as a society think, believe, and hold true. But what I thought more about after the class is what information these conglomerates could be feeding us. When these big companies own dozens or even hundreds of smaller companies, they have the ability and the means to display their own message in whatever way possible. These messages could be beneficial to the public, or completely against the people's best interests. But no matter the content of these messages, they have the full potential to control the public's views and opinions. Because of this I see congl...