Skip to main content

My Response to Liz Klein's Post about The Killing of Botham Jean


Liz's Original Post

When I read Liz's post, I totally agreed with what she had to say. I believe that what happened to Botham Jean is completely inexcusable. I also believe that this was another example of police using their power and authority to target unarmed, black men. I agree with Liz that it would be absolutely terrifying to be in his situation. He was doing absolutely nothing wrong. The fault of this crime belongs on the shoulders of the Dallas police officer, Amber Guyger.
It's a disturbing and contradictory thought. Police are meant to be the watchdogs and protectors of our communities. They're meant to keep us safe. It's in their job description. So why would someone, who should be the most trained member of our society in gun safety, be so reckless. How come she didn't see the moved furniture? How didn't she see the doormat? Why was her gun her first reaction?
It is because of tragedies like this, that men, women, and children of color see the police as less of people to trust and to feel safe with, and more as something to fear.
Although I, as a white man, have never experienced anything even close to what people of color go through every day, I try to comprehend the struggles that they face.
For Liz's final statement, she states, "Regardless of how you choose to picture it, Botham Jean, a black man, was murdered while doing nothing but simply living his life..." It's terrifying really. The thought of being so vulnerable, in your own home, and to have your life taken away from you. To be taken from your family. To be taken from your community. And all because you were doing everything right.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Magazines and Me.

When discussing magazines in class and talking about their original intent of delivering something to every person, that idea really clicked with me. Personally, when I have a magazine, I do as I please in terms of reading and comprehension. Magazines have just always been that medium that could give you whatever it is you wanted at the time. Like if you were in the mood to read an in-depth article, there are always countless stories to dive into. But at the same time, there is a wide variety of photo journalistic aspects, and quizzes, and more fluff than you know what to do with. Even though we didn't really discuss this in class, I thought about it more after. When I really think about it, Magazines are like many other forms of media, for the fact that it holds a lot of cultural significance. For me at least, magazines have always been a staple in my household. I can remember distinct memories of magazines and flipping through them dozens and dozens of times as a...

The Importance of us.

In digital design class on the twenty-ninth, we spent around half of our class discussing the events that occurred over the weekend. These event being the Kroger shooting in Louisville, the Synagogue shooting in Pittsburg, and the multiple pipe bombs delivered around the country. As a class, we all gathered with the other half of the J&C magnet in Mr. Miller's room and had a very frank and open discussion about how we felt.  I was really happy that as a group, we all came together to talk about the tragic events over the weekend. I like the idea that as a magnet, we can come together when huge events occur and feel safe to share how we feel, and what to do.  We talked about what fueled these events, and things like, what actions have been taken by our government in recent times. Something that really stuck with me was what Miss Palmer said about our generation. She talked about how much change we as a group have the potential to bring, and the power that we hav...

It May be Candy Corn, but is it Relevant?

In a story ran on Wave3's website entitled, "On eve of Halloween, it's National Candy Corn Day", the station posted the story, originally done by CNN. Now while I do agree that Candy Corn seems to be a surprisingly heated subject for people to discuss, I find it completely ridiculous to feel it necessary to make a story out of it. Now I do understand, Wave3 did not have anything to do with the writing of the story. But similar to what we discussed in class, a news media outlet doesn't have  to share anything and everything. Wave3, didn't at all have to share this pointless story. This story by no means follows the yardsticks of journalism. In fact, it completely goes against the very guidelines of Newsworthiness  and Explanation. In terms of this story being locally relevant, there's not much to say. This will have no large effect on anyone, nor will it have any lasting effect on anyone. This proved that is directly violates to yardstick of Newsworthine...