Skip to main content

Ancient Printing Discussion

In class today, we learned about the ancient forms of printing. We discussed the Mesopotamian form of stamping important documents, the Roman screw press, the wood block method from the Han Dynasty and the Egyptians, the first ever mobile type press created in China, and the Gutenberg created in Germany. When we were talking about the Gutenberg and how its creation made printing the bible much easier,  I was very interested in the fact that the top tier of the social pyramid disagreed with the creation of the press.
Because only the rich, powerful, and influential could even comprehend purchasing a bible at the time, what they said of the bible was the truth to those who could not afford it. With this power, these people could tell the lower class anything, and pass it off as "God's Word." With the creation of the Gutenberg printing press though, it made writing these bibles cheaper,more efficient, and better for the people, as it was written in their own language, German. Because of this the higher-ups understood that the press could lead to their own downfall.
When I heard this in class, I decided to correlate it to our modern day life. I believe that although definitely not the same situation, people in power do use their status and symbol to tell us things that they want us to hear. And in many cases, the things they want us to hear are not exactly the truth. But with journalism and the media coverage holding their loyalty to the people, it leaves me feeling safer knowing that little can be hid when journalists are upholding the elements of truth, and loyalty.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Biases and Journalism.

For this blog post, I decided to take it back to the very beginning of school. To our discussion of what makes a good journalist. When we discussed what makes a good journalist and good journalism, the class was asked to share out what we believed the aspects of good journalism to be. Among the many standards, the quality of unbiased  was presented. This aspect stuck with me and made me think deeper about what it entails from a journalistic point of view. Of course it makes since. We as people appreciate our new and media to be completely objective. We want the facts with one hundred percent certainty that they haven't been given to us with a kind of filter on them. But i think it's important to realize just how biased we as humans are. No matter if we'd like to admit it or not, everyone has biases. Even journalists. Which means that a lot of the things that you'll find out in the media is definitely biased. Whether it's that of the writer or the company overlook...
Post a Comment
Read more

It May be Candy Corn, but is it Relevant?

In a story ran on Wave3's website entitled, "On eve of Halloween, it's National Candy Corn Day", the station posted the story, originally done by CNN. Now while I do agree that Candy Corn seems to be a surprisingly heated subject for people to discuss, I find it completely ridiculous to feel it necessary to make a story out of it. Now I do understand, Wave3 did not have anything to do with the writing of the story. But similar to what we discussed in class, a news media outlet doesn't have  to share anything and everything. Wave3, didn't at all have to share this pointless story. This story by no means follows the yardsticks of journalism. In fact, it completely goes against the very guidelines of Newsworthiness  and Explanation. In terms of this story being locally relevant, there's not much to say. This will have no large effect on anyone, nor will it have any lasting effect on anyone. This proved that is directly violates to yardstick of Newsworthine...
Post a Comment
Read more

My Thoughts on Conglomeration

In Mr. Miller's class, we discussed conglomeration and the pro's and con's of it. At first, I honestly hadn't thought that deeply into giant corporations such as The Walt Disney Company or AT&T. But because of our discussion in class, its helped me realize more about the affect of conglomerates. What I had thought was obvious before class was that these huge corporations has a massive impact on what we as a society think, believe, and hold true. But what I thought more about after the class is what information these conglomerates could be feeding us. When these big companies own dozens or even hundreds of smaller companies, they have the ability and the means to display their own message in whatever way possible. These messages could be beneficial to the public, or completely against the people's best interests. But no matter the content of these messages, they have the full potential to control the public's views and opinions. Because of this I see congl...
Post a Comment
Read more