Skip to main content

My Response to Christeen

Christeen's Original Post

When I read Christeen's blog entry about mass communication in the modern world, I really understood what what she was saying.
Christeen stated that "You don't have to be an award winning author or director to get a message across." This was a statement I could understand and made sense for me. In our new era of technological advancements, we all have access to the Internet. To agree again with Christeen, to have access to an Internet connection is to have a massive amount of power right at your finger tips. Even I have the ability to mass communicate. In fact, I'm doing it right now. As I type this blog about one of my high school classmates entries for our first real project of our freshman year, it's being saved for anyone who can get to the Internet to see for years and years to come. Although it may seem unlikely, this very blog post has the potential to reach hundreds, thousands, even millions of people. It's crazy to think how easy it has become for anyone, in any place, at any time, to mass communicate whatever message they want to.
To some, it's a scary thought. That all people have the power to mass communicate whatever message they please. But I think it's amazing. It's truly astonishing to see how far we as people have come in the terms of mass communication, the media, and journalism as a whole.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Biases and Journalism.

For this blog post, I decided to take it back to the very beginning of school. To our discussion of what makes a good journalist. When we discussed what makes a good journalist and good journalism, the class was asked to share out what we believed the aspects of good journalism to be. Among the many standards, the quality of unbiased  was presented. This aspect stuck with me and made me think deeper about what it entails from a journalistic point of view. Of course it makes since. We as people appreciate our new and media to be completely objective. We want the facts with one hundred percent certainty that they haven't been given to us with a kind of filter on them. But i think it's important to realize just how biased we as humans are. No matter if we'd like to admit it or not, everyone has biases. Even journalists. Which means that a lot of the things that you'll find out in the media is definitely biased. Whether it's that of the writer or the company overlook...
Post a Comment
Read more

It May be Candy Corn, but is it Relevant?

In a story ran on Wave3's website entitled, "On eve of Halloween, it's National Candy Corn Day", the station posted the story, originally done by CNN. Now while I do agree that Candy Corn seems to be a surprisingly heated subject for people to discuss, I find it completely ridiculous to feel it necessary to make a story out of it. Now I do understand, Wave3 did not have anything to do with the writing of the story. But similar to what we discussed in class, a news media outlet doesn't have  to share anything and everything. Wave3, didn't at all have to share this pointless story. This story by no means follows the yardsticks of journalism. In fact, it completely goes against the very guidelines of Newsworthiness  and Explanation. In terms of this story being locally relevant, there's not much to say. This will have no large effect on anyone, nor will it have any lasting effect on anyone. This proved that is directly violates to yardstick of Newsworthine...
Post a Comment
Read more

My Thoughts on Conglomeration

In Mr. Miller's class, we discussed conglomeration and the pro's and con's of it. At first, I honestly hadn't thought that deeply into giant corporations such as The Walt Disney Company or AT&T. But because of our discussion in class, its helped me realize more about the affect of conglomerates. What I had thought was obvious before class was that these huge corporations has a massive impact on what we as a society think, believe, and hold true. But what I thought more about after the class is what information these conglomerates could be feeding us. When these big companies own dozens or even hundreds of smaller companies, they have the ability and the means to display their own message in whatever way possible. These messages could be beneficial to the public, or completely against the people's best interests. But no matter the content of these messages, they have the full potential to control the public's views and opinions. Because of this I see congl...
Post a Comment
Read more