Skip to main content

My Thoughts on Conglomeration

In Mr. Miller's class, we discussed conglomeration and the pro's and con's of it. At first, I honestly hadn't thought that deeply into giant corporations such as The Walt Disney Company or AT&T. But because of our discussion in class, its helped me realize more about the affect of conglomerates.
What I had thought was obvious before class was that these huge corporations has a massive impact on what we as a society think, believe, and hold true. But what I thought more about after the class is what information these conglomerates could be feeding us.
When these big companies own dozens or even hundreds of smaller companies, they have the ability and the means to display their own message in whatever way possible. These messages could be beneficial to the public, or completely against the people's best interests. But no matter the content of these messages, they have the full potential to control the public's views and opinions.
Because of this I see conglomerates as powerful and frightening businesses. To have that much power is an unsettling thought. But I'm glad that I've become just a little more aware of the world and what exactly is happening.                                         

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Entertaining, but not Newsworthy.

In a story featured on Wave3 news' online page titled, " Mom, daughter score winning $1 million Powerball ticket in Crestwood," Wave3 reported on the lucky winners. Now, while this may have been interesting to hear about a winning ticket so close to home, it is in no way particularly newsworthy. Of course, this was a enormous amount of money that these two women are now the proud recipients of, but that in no way means that it follows any of the elements or yardsticks of journalism. I believe and know that our local news has the duty and obligation to provide us with the most current, correct, and newsworthy news. But when stories like this are so frequently aired, it makes me feel like our own news stations don't value providing us with news that will have any lasting impact on our community whatsoever. Wave3's Original Story

It May be Candy Corn, but is it Relevant?

In a story ran on Wave3's website entitled, "On eve of Halloween, it's National Candy Corn Day", the station posted the story, originally done by CNN. Now while I do agree that Candy Corn seems to be a surprisingly heated subject for people to discuss, I find it completely ridiculous to feel it necessary to make a story out of it. Now I do understand, Wave3 did not have anything to do with the writing of the story. But similar to what we discussed in class, a news media outlet doesn't have  to share anything and everything. Wave3, didn't at all have to share this pointless story. This story by no means follows the yardsticks of journalism. In fact, it completely goes against the very guidelines of Newsworthiness  and Explanation. In terms of this story being locally relevant, there's not much to say. This will have no large effect on anyone, nor will it have any lasting effect on anyone. This proved that is directly violates to yardstick of Newsworthine...